With interest I have read all the posts of Suzy's case study and I have learned a lot from them.
I am however, a bit confused as to how it all relates to my own situation.
In the last three years I have written (and self-published) two non-fiction books about the history of York United Kingdom, the town I then lived. Since I have returned to my native country (Netherlands), I have written a third book, which happens to be a travel book, telling the story about the time I worked on containerships.
Although I have travelled a lot, I have never written anything about it (apart from the containership book), so I wouldn't call myself a travel writer.
I will probably write more books after this one, but they could be about a variety of subjects or maybe they will be about travelling. I just don't know yet.
The only blogging that I have ever done was on Lifejournal, which I have always seen as just some loose thoughts from my side, more like a diary that everyone is allowed to read, than anything serious.
With all this in mind is it therefore a good idea for me to start up a proper blog as decribed in the Suzy case study?
I do realise that a blog (particularly one in a niche market) doesn't necessarily needs to go about travelling. It could be about anything the writer interests. But I understand that part of the purpose of a blog is that prospective publishers/literary agents can have a sample of your writing, without having to go through the trouble of having to email you etc.
I am looking for an agent/publisher for my new book, that happens to be a travel book, but I wouldn't be able to put together an interesting travel blog, simply because I wouldn't know what to write about.
Should I start a blog regardless (my niche market would be architectural history...) and still direct agents to it even though it is not about travelling?
I am rambling, but I hope you can see my problem. What would you guys do if you were in my situation?